RSS

Category Archives: Support Our Urgent Campaigns

Urgent Action For Tibetan Protester Namkha Gyaltsen

Double Click For Larger View

Image:archivenet

We are launching an action in support of a Tibetan arrested on January 25 for distributing pro-Tibet leaflets at Barkhor Square in Lhasa, occupied Tibet. According to information from the Tibetan Center For Human Rights and Democracy  TCHRD and Dossier Tibet:

‘The arrest of Namkha Gyaltsen, aged 25, happened at around 5 pm (Tibet Local Time) on 25 January 2012. Sources informed TCHRD that police officers arrested Namkha Gyaltsen near the Nang-tse-shak building at Barkhor as he distributed leaflets that contained slogans for the swift return of His Holiness the Dalai Lama to Tibet and freedom for Tibet.Namkha Gyaltsen was born in Golog area of Amdo in Eastern Tibet.’

Action

We would ask all our friends and subscribers to please join our campaign to support Namkha by taking part in any of the   following actions:

1) Contact your Senator, MEP or MP and request the write to the Ambassador of the Chinese Embassy in your country to demand that China respect the human rights and welfare of Namkha Gyaltsen

2) Alternatively you can write a letter of concern in support of Namkha directly to the the Chinese Embassy in your country, contact details here

3) You can also support Namkha by expressing your concern to

Ms Navanethem Pillay  UN High Commissioner for Human Rights: InfoDesk@ohchr.org

To: Ms Barbara Lochbihler,Chair,
Sub-Committee on Human Rights, European Parliament   barbara.lochbihler@europarl.europa.eu

 
 

Make Sure Cameron Gets The Message Of Tibet’s Independence

With China’s Premier surrounded by sycophantic UK businessmen and government officials, waving Chinese flags and salivating at the thought of trade deals, to mark his visit Tibetans and their supporters have organized a protest outside the palatial opulence of London’s appropriately named Mandarin Oriental Hotel, which will be hosting Wen Jiabao.

London's Mandarin Hotel Hosting Wen Jiabao

Image: LondonBeats

Further demonstrations were arranged opposite Downing Street, although the BBC largely ignored reference to Tibet or such protests in its coverage, to expose a number of major concerns resulting from China’s occupation of Tibet, notably the ongoing military lockdown and oppression visited by China’s ‘security’ forces, upon Kirti Monastery, in Amdo Eastern Tibet. In addition folks in the UK have been asked to get involved in a lobbying campaign directed towards British leader, David Cameron, who is to host a UK-China Summit during Wen’s trip.

While recognizing the importance and urgency of the issues given prominence in these protests, it is disappointing to note on this major occasion, with the attendent media exposure, that once again the Tibet movement in Britain has opted to offer not one reference to the struggle being waged by Tibetans for their nation’s independence. In an echo of previous events held in the UK, while public statements and literature rightfullydemand an end to suppression and call for justice and respect for human rights, the very goal Tibetans are striving for is absent!

What, we should ask, would Tibetans inside Tibet feel about such a selective and dilute representation? After all they are fighting for nothing less than independence, and paying a terrible price for such dissent, it would be entirely reasonable of those facing torture to demand Tibet’s national liberation, to question why those with the freedom to speak have chosen to remain silent, on the issue that defines Tibet’s struggle. Surely Tibetans in Britain can support that goal?

Inside Tibet The Message is Clear-Amdo March 2008

Inside Tibet The Message is Clear-Amdo March 2008

Image: TCHRD

Online Action

If you would like to help ensure that Tibet’s true cause is presented to the British Prime Minister’s Office please post the following question:

Dear David Cameron

I/we urge your office to recognize that within international law that Tibet is an independent nation under illegal occupation, and that Tibetans, being a distinct people. retain the right to (at the very least) self-determination. Will you also acknowledge that Tibetans inside Tibet, in their ongoing resistance to Chinese occupation, are demanding independence for Tibet?

Send Via Here

 

Tibet’s Torturers Chair UN Committee On Torture!

China Ambassador Wang, Xuexian Vice-Chair Of UN Committee On Torture

Image:chinaembassyit

The United Nations Committee On Torture (COT) consists of ten individual ‘experts’ who assemble in Geneva, Switzerland twice a year to initiate and assess reports of torture relating to member states. Incredible to believe but among its ranks is a Wang Xuexian,  Chinese Ambassador, tasked no doubt to deflect criticism or meaningful action on China’s appalling record. However, despite his troubling presence China has attracted the attention of the COT on a number of occasions, particularly in relation to the violent and tyrannical treatment of Tibetans under China’s occupation. Following the 2008 Tibetan national uprising against China’s rule, which was viciously suppressed by China’s military and ‘security’ forces, with a mass of documented reports of killings, executions, torture and mass arrest, the COT convened its Forty-first session Geneva, November 3 to 21, 2008 to consider such accounts and appraise related evidence, as part of a general assessment on China. An advanced report was released on November 21 that year, which was pretty damning in terms of exposing a wide range of abuse and torture existing within China and occupied territories such as Tibet. In particular reference was made to events in Ngaba, in Tibet’s Eastern region of Amdo, the same area which is home to Kirti Monastery; which during April 2011 was placed under military siege by Chinese paramilitary, with at least three unarmed Tibetans killed, hundreds arrested and tortured as the monastery was ransacked and turned effectively into a prison.

Apart from revealing the extent and nature of violence and torture waged against Tibetans in 2008, as China’s regime launched a brutal crackdown the findings of the CAT requested that:

“The State party should conduct a thorough and independent inquiry into the reported excessive use of force, including against peaceful demonstrators and notably monks, in Kardze county, Ngaba county, and Lhasa.” . Source: Page 9, Fourth Periodic Report of China-CAT November 2008 (may take a minute or so to download)

At this stage of reading no doubt some will be pinching themselves and questioning if what they have just read is correct and not some distorted phantom of imagining. Well just to confirm, yes the United Nations Committee On Torture requested, the very Chinese authorities who demand, endorse, authorize and condone the violent abuse of Tibetans, to  establish an impartial and effective investigation into the frenzied and lethal attacks carried out by their military thugs. This petition, which called presumably for a formal response from the Chinese regime, is either an example of political optimism and naivety  beyond any known scale, bureaucratic bungling of circus proportions, or a cynical exercise. Whatever the case, to expect China to provide a balanced and detached examination, of its brutal actions in occupied Tibet, would be like anticipating Himmler’s SS to produce an unbiased account of its treatment of Polish Jews!   We wonder how the honourable Committee members of the COT regarded China’s response, a credible and non-partisan conclusion perhaps?

If such a delusional conclusion was reached how are this years’ events in Ngaba being evaluated  and viewed by the COT, as it witnesses the same military machine launch yet another vicious assault upon Tibetans and notes reports of further deaths, torture and mass-arrests. What now the oily euphemisms and assurances that no doubt filled the pages of China’s conclusions to its cynical ‘inquiry’, regarding its brutal crackdown of Tibetans in 2008; consumed with a troubling and uncritical willingness by the COT? We consider these to be vital questions which demand a response from the United Nations Committee On Torture, as Tibetans in Ngaba again suffer China’s machinery of violent suppression.

Please join us in emailing the following question to the COT

‘In light of the worrying findings regarding China’s violent crackdown of Tibetan protests in Ngaba, Amdo Region of Eastern Tibet, featured in of your Fourth Periodic Report of China (November 2008) and extremely concerned to note that during April 2011 Chinese paramilitary military forces have once again launched a lethal and vicious attack against unarmed Tibetans, who were seeking to protect their local Buddhist Monastery of Kirti from being subject to draconian and oppressive interference, I am requesting your office to urgently review China’s assurances, submitted to your Committee concerning events in Ngaba during 2008, which required China to make available a report to your Offices arising from an independent and thorough examination. Furthermore, I request that your Committee launch an immediate investigation into reports of torture, killings and violent suppression suffered by Tibetans in Ngaba during April this year.’

 

National Geographic-Wiping Tibet Off The Map?

Tibet Map-1906

As distinct territories the now occupied lands of Tibet, East Turkestan, Inner Mongolia and Manchuria appeared in atlases and upon maps throughout the later 19th and 20th Centuries, See: 1911 Map Click On New Window.

Look in most atlases today and it is becoming increasingly difficult to find the name ‘Tibet’, while the other territories have been removed completely by the vast majority of cartographers. Tibet itself usually features as the truncated geo-political creation, named by communist China as ‘‘Tibet Autonomous Region’. Closer inspection will reveal that former Tibetan place-names such as Shigatse have been changed to more Chinese-sounding Xigatse. This is no accident, Communist China has a ‘Geographical Place-Names Committee’ whose task is to invent Chinese place names to replace those in areas such as Tibet and East Turkestan; it is part of a deliberate attempt to present Tibet as a bona-fide part of China. Sadly, some leading western map publishers and geographical institutions are assisting this deception by publishing Sinocised maps of Tibet. Even the respected National Geographic (NG) has promoted this cynical and political fiction, and appears unwilling to feature genuine Tibetan place names in its publications. It was not always so as its maps had for decades had shown Tibet clearly marked, along with non-Chinese versions of Tibetan towns.

1960s NG Map Showing Non-Sinocized Place Names In Tibet

Image:nationalgeographic

1970s NG Map Showing Non-Sinocized Place Names In Tibet

Image:nationalgeographic

1980 NG Map Now Showing Tibetan Place Names In Sinocized Style

Image:nationalgeographic

1994 NG Map Shows Sinocised Place Names In Tibet

Image:nationalgeographic

Current NG Map Showing Fully Chinese Versions Of Tibetan Place Names

Image:nationalgeographic

Following many years of presenting Tibet on its maps with non-Chinese variants of Tibetan place names, by 1980  people had noticed and questioned if  NG had approved the use of Chinese-sounding names? What does seem certain is at that time original phonetic renderings of Tibetan names were cleared from its maps, to give way to Sinocized versions, an act which supported the bogus claim that Tibet was part of Chinese territory. Given the eminent position of NG within the academic, map-making and geographic community it was not long before other cartographers followed suit in endorsing, through maps and atlases, China’s propaganda assertions concerning Tibet’s territorial status.

Yet National Geographic’s Map Policy assures the public that its cartography “strives to be apolitical” that being so how does its Map Committee explain what seems to have been a considered change of policy towards its maps of Tibet, possibly decided sometime in the very late 1970s, by approving the Sinofication of Tibetan place names. Such an action, taken we must imagine with the knowledge and possible encouragement and cooperation of China’s regime, surely constitutes a political action on the part of National Geographic? What could have prompted this troubling decision to appease China’s regime by substituting bogus Chinese versions of Tibetan place names, which NG had formerly faithfully represented? Some may argue that the respected journal was simply reflecting a political reality, well if that was so why, given Tibet was illegally annexed in 1950 and subsequently came under the military and political tyranny of China, did National Geographic continue for nearly thirty years to accurately represent authentic Tibetan place names on its maps? The political facts were that Tibet had been occupied for decades, yet to its credit NG had rightly followed a policy that featured Tibetan place names, those circumstances had not changed, so what had influenced National Geographic, to what appears to have been a deliberate policy change?

Was it purely coincidental that around 1980 China was beginning to open its doors to greater academic and economic contact with the West? Did the propspect of engagement with China, and the no doubt alluring academic, career and financial benefits, prove an irresistable determinant? Whatever the facts, in deciding to produce maps that show Tibet and its settlements with Chinese-sounding names surely benefits China’s propaganda aims, to persuade the world of the supposed legitimacy of its claims over Tibet.

ONLINE ACTION

It is surely time to put Tibet back on the world map, minus China’s poisonous distortions, if you agree please help us by emailing National Geographic and asking them to restore Tibet and authentic Tibetan place names on its maps and atlases. They may be contacted here: maps@ngs.org

NB: Map extracts here are for educational purposes to supplement written content.

 

Exposing The Horrors Of China’s ‘One Child’Policy

Tibettruth wishes to applaud the tremendous work of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers for its determined researches and campaigining to expose and challenge China’s coercive birth control program and the harrowing atrocities it inflicts upon women in China and occupied lands such as Tibet and East Turkestan. As part of ongoing efforts to increase awareness and understanding WRWF has produced a short video on this major human rights issue.

“Here is our new video exposing the truth about China’s One Child Policy, and what Women’s Rights Without Frontiers is doing about it.  Please take 4 minutes to watch it.  Also, please feel free to share it on Facebook, Twitter and other social networking sites.  Encourage your friends to sign the petition as well. We’d really like this video to “go viral”; we have plans to translate it into Mandarin, Spanish, Italian, and other languages.  The world must know”  Women’s Rights Without Frontiers

Will the recently launched UN Women, or women’s NGOs feel sufficiently moved to take action and oppose such violations, or shall we witness during 2011 the same shameful silence and evasion which has characterized the response of so many women’s organizations and activists. The traumatized women of China, whose human rights are so viciously violated by the horrors of forced sterilizations, deserve urgent and concerted support from those who claim so loudly to be champions of women’s rights.

 

FIFA, Don’t Let China’s Ugly Regime Host The Beautiful Game

Craig Reedie IOC Executive Member Claimed China Was More Free

“Since the Games were awarded to China we have seen significant advances and I have no doubt it is a better, freer country than it was in 2001,” he says. “There is significantly greater freedom of movement and the media (sic). There have been significant reforms of the labour laws, action on pollution and the judicial system has also seen some reform. Craig Reedie IOC Executive Member (Emphasis Added) The Guardian  March 3, 2008

In an effort to diffuse justifiable international concerns regarding China’s hosting of the 2008 Olympics, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) launched a public relations assault to convince a disbelieving world that, as a consequence of granting the games to Beijing, a moderating influence would be exerted and  human rights improved. Such ‘reassurances’ were of course entirely cynical, and those who manipulated media reportage on the issue were acutely aware that the oppression, censorship, violations and brutal occupation of Tibet and East Turkestan, would not in all reality be reduced. The same year witnessed inside occupied Tibet a national Uprising for independence, which was viciously suppressed with countless Tibetans, killed, tortured and jailed.

The spilled blood barely dry, as snake-like assurances about the Games improving freedoms were exposed as bogus and self-servingly hollow. There was never any prospect of ethics prevailing over commercial and political interest in conferring the 2008 Olympics to China, nor were the platitudes on human rights from the IOC and its supporters genuinely concerned with expressing solidarity with the millions suffering violent suppression as a result of China’s regime.

Such is the extent of China’s economic allure and political influence, it’s tyrannical violence is shunted into some dark siding of indifference by the ethically bankrupt, more concerned with maximising the commercial opportunities offered by collaborating with the Chinese Regime. Supported by colossal public relations resources, and assisted by a servile media, any concerns expressed in terms of human rights or freedoms of peoples, are marginalized, ignored or dismissed by asserting improvements supposedly arising from engaging with China.

FIFA President Sepp Blatter In Beijing 2008

Image:daylife

It is a thoroughly threadbare and cynical fabrication, designed to condescendingly assuage public criticism, yet as evidenced by the violent suppression in occupied Tibet and East Turkestan,  the communist regime in China is a serial abuser, whose psychotic excesses will not be moderated by so-called constructive engagement, nor awarding international sporting competitions, no matter how prestigious. Which brings us to events in Zurich on December 3 this year, as soccer’s international body, FIFA announced the countries hosting the 2018 and 2022 World Cup respectively.

That decision generated excitement enough, and disappointment for England, who had somewhat arrogantly considered their bid was a done deal. Of more interest to those concerned with human rights and freedom, was a remark made by President of Fédération Internationale de Football Association. In an appeasing rewrite of history, Mr. Sepp Blatter added insult to the injury of the English failed bid, by reportedly claiming the game did not originate on the industrial fields of Victorian England, but was seemingly  invented by ancient China

FIFA Head (Center) Gets Red Carpet Treatment From China

Image:archivenet

With a futuristic eye on the 2026 or 2030 World Cup there has been much talk within soccer’s international governing body of awarding the competition to China, an event which no doubt will appeal greatly to the Chinese communist party, as yet another opportunity to promote its sickening propaganda that peddles the fiction of China as a progressive and civilized state. It is not difficult to imagine the FIFA hierarchy as honoured guests, while beyond the cheering crowds and flag waving soccer fans, the agonies inflicted by electric cattle prods will continue to terrorize those who express dissent or a demand for freedom and human rights.

Direct Action

If you are concerned at the prospect of the beautiful game being tainted by association with China’s oppressive and violent regime and wish to express your opposition then please help us by emailing your country’s FIFA representative, and request them not to support any move to award China the World Cup.

Details of FIFA Country Representatives Here: http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/federation/associations.html

 

Join The Movement Against China’s Terrorism

 

Update: Ms Yeshi Choedon-A Tibetan Political Prisoner

 

Ms Yeshi Choedon-Tibetan Political Prisoner

Tibettruth is very happy to report that awareness of  Yeshi Choedon’s case is growing daily, thanks to the tremendous kindness and determination from many of our subscribers, and also due to the activism and concern of our friends and supporters at Tibettruth-Twitter. The response has been inspiring as friends of Tibettruth from around the world have been making sure that across the internet, socal media sites and wider media Yeshi is not forgotten. It was particularly moving to receive a communication from Yeshi Choedon’s family, who expressed their gratitude and support of our efforts to support Yeshi. Tibettruth shall certainly not rest as the campaign continues, with more- and-more people actively opposing  the injustice and oppression, which sees so many Tibetans imprisoned and abused by communist China, for daring to express their opposition to the occupation of Tibet.  

So let’s keep the movement for Yeshi Choedon moving forward, please copy and paste our appeal and email to the Offices of the United Nations High Commissison for Human Rights and European Parliament Sub-Committee on Human Rights. Share this link with your friends, inform local and national media, tell your Member of Congress/Senate or Parliament. Don’t allow Yeshi and her family to feel alone, let’s make this happen and remind the Chinese Regime that the world is very aware of Yeshi and all Tibetan political prisoners.

A big thank you to all the followers of @tibettruth

If you find this post of interest it will be most helpful if you would kindly share on any social network/s which you may subscribe to. Use the buttons below to add the post so others may become aware of this issue. Many thanks

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

 

Online Action To Free Dondup Wangchen

http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5380/t/7424/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1125

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 23, 2009 in Support Our Urgent Campaigns

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,014 other followers