RSS

Tag Archives: Human Rights

What’s The Irish For ‘Placating China’?

Image:broadsheetie

As Ireland finds itself enslaved by the draconian economic demands of the European Union and International Monetary Fund, the socially crippling cost of addressing a national debt (created in part by the very banks who now will profit from measures forced upon the good people of Eire) sees  Enda Kenny’s (Prime Minister Above) Government scrambling in the dirt looking  for the fabled shoots of recovery. To encourage such growth treasury officials in Dublin are anxious to secure foreign investment, and who else would they turn to but China. With 175 million Euros targeted at the creation of a China trade center in Athlone, no doubt to the delight of the Ireland-China Association, the impending visit by China’s Vice President attracts a particular significance for Ireland’s political establishment. We can be sure that every effort will be made to accommodate Mr. Xi Jinping and his entourage, far beyond the usual generosity accorded to visiting political leaders. Of course the proponents of ‘what’s good for business, is good for Ireland’ will be fully present at the edge of the aptly red carpet, who knows perhaps some have been practising some Mandarin greetings, now there’s a sound to charm the ears, the Kerry brogue grappling with the tonal nuances of Chinese! .

Beneath, however, the painted smiles, diplomatic posturing and warm words of praise expected to greet China’s Vice President is an economic real-politic and the uneasy sight of Ireland’s bankers, politicians and business kowtowing to the representative of a nation with the blood of countless numbers on its hands will, we may anticipate, be evaded, justified or ignored by  the jaded argument, that constructive engagement with China will lead to improvements in terms of human rights and basic freedoms.  This phony mantra, a favorite of those who care more for profits than rights,  has been repeated for years by the United States and proved a singular failure, of course its proponents are acutely aware that it was never going to bring positive change nor lessen the suffering of millions who endure China’s tyranny. It is a cynical justification, a corrosive denial that enables any element of conscience to be dropped into a very deep well.

Instead of putting on its Sunday best and offering another biscuit to that nice man from China maybe Rialtas na hÉireann (Ireland’s Government) would benefit from investing a similar interest and commitment towards the catalogue of atrocities that enables China’s regime to maintain power. If that fails to awaken the suits from Dublin they could always examine the harrowing issue of China’s coercive population control program, in which women are dragged from their homes, tied onto a medical slab and forcibly sterilized   Then of course there is occupied Tibet, a land whose people have been viciously denied their national freedom, human rights since China invaded in 1950, as shown by recent reports resistance to China’s tyranny continues, including the self-immolation of 23 Tibetans, who sacrificed themselves for Tibetan independence and in support of the Dalai Lama. A brutal crackdown by Chinese paramilitary forces is now under-way, huge areas are under siege, these are days of mass arrests, trucks disappearing into the cold night, torture and oppression the psychopathic response to any dissenting voice

Ireland’s Government is acutely aware of the cultural genocide waged against the Tibetan and Uyghur people, cognisant too of the forced-labor camps where colossal numbers of people endure abuse and conditions not seen since Stalinist Russia. They are conscious equally of China’s  disturbing record on executions, the torture cells and persecution of Falon Gong practitioners Yet knowledge without action can be a pernicious form of denial, particularly when fuelled by economic interest, it also a tacit endorsement of such violations, however these inconvenient facts are dismissed by the champions of commercial engagement with China. They may as well be Holocaust deniers!

It does not of course have to be this way, there exists still among Ireland’s people, a profound sense of justice and empathy towards those suffering the odious realities of colonization and oppression, a reflection of Ireland’s experiences under British rule. We need only consider the tireless actions of Mary Robinson and Mairead Maguire, or the prominent support extended to Palestine, to realize that the values of justice, human rights and national freedom are cherished by Eire’s people.  That profound sense of acknowledging a truth and representing a fundamental goodness once found poignant expression in the words of Mr. Frank Aiken, Ireland’s UN Ambassador, who during the 1959 UN General Assembly debate on Tibet noted:

“Looking around this assembly, … I think how many benches would be empty in this hall if it had always been agreed that when a small nation or a small people fall in the grip of a major power no one could ever raise their voice here; that once there was a subject nation, then must always remain a subject nation. Tibet has fallen into the hands of the Chinese People’s Republic for the last few years. For thousands of years, … it was as free and as fully in control of its own affairs as any nation in this Assembly, and a thousand times more free to look after its own affairs than many of the nations here.”

Many will be both surprised and disappointed that of all nations, Ireland, once under foreign occupation, colonized, exploited and its culture suppressed, finds itself with a political and business elite who, entranced by the spell of China’s economic allure, have abandoned the very principles from which Ireland as nation was forged. As the band of Óglagh nahÉireann (Ireland’s Defense Force) strikes into the troubling strains of China’s national anthem to greet Xi Jinping, no one possessed of integrity and normal intelligence, will be convinced by, nor comfortable with, the ethics of arguing that Prime Minister Enda Kenny’s slogan ‘Let’s Get Ireland Working’ be supported by collaborating with a totalitarian state, nor take precedence over the human rights and freedom of all those tortured and oppressed by China.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 12, 2012 in Appeasing China, News Item, Tibet

 

Tags: , , , ,

UK Foreign Office Regards China’s Forced Sterilizations Not Violation Of Human Rights

 

Double Click For Larger View

Image: courtesy of @AnonymousTibet

Once again the British Foreign Office (equivalent to the State Department) has chosen to ignore entirely the issue of forced sterilizations in its latest Human Rights Country Report On China. Not a single mention of this major violation of women’s human rights, the report, along with the cynical omission of this issue, may be seen HERE

This Department has been presented detailed material on this harrowing subject for many years and is acutely aware of the horrors it inflicts upon Chinese, Uyghur,Tibetan, Mongolian and Manchurian women. It is however more concerned with trade considerations and appeasing China to facilitate ‘positive relations’ even at the expense of ignoring the reality of these sickening atrocities.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on January 16, 2012 in Appeasing China, News Item

 

Tags: , , , ,

Shameful Silence And Complicity Of The CSW

Image:tibettruth

Tibettruth offers on-line campaigns, news and factual information on a range of human rights themes. Prominent among these is communist China’s treatment of women and in particular its coercive population control program, which as is now well known grossly violates the principle of freedom of choice and a woman’s right to control over her own body. In occupied Tibet, East Turkestan and communist China women are denied these freedoms and subject to the dictate of a regime that inflicts a series of draconian penalties; including financial/mental/physical coercion, including forced sterilizations. The extent and nature of these abuses is staggering, yet what is equally alarming is the uncaring reaction of the Commission On The Status Of Women and its NGO Committee. One can only imagine the reaction if women in Germany were subject to a population progam that witnessed women dragged from their home,  beaten, tied to a medical slab and forcibly sterilised.  There would be riots on the streets and rightly so!

Such barbarity is a central element in China’s population programme and has traumatised countless women across the communist Chinese Empire and yet all we have from the Commission on the Status of Women and its NGO Committee is silence. How can any balanced and intelligent feminist claim to be genuinely concerned about human rights, and yet ignore or deny the plight of women subject to this brutality? Following fifteen years (since the Beijing Declaration of 1995) of in-action and fudging from the CSW it seems we dealing, not with a lack-of-evidence, but a singular lack of compassion and integrity.

True, it is an appalling subject and perhaps too horrific for some, understandable psychology to pretend its not happening, although such denial could be argued to be ethically troubling.  For others it would appear that reducing global population levels is worth any price, including human rights violations (even the devastated lives of our sisters in Tibet, East Turkestan and Communist China). Others among may hold all things communist/socialist in fond regard and so shunt any inconvenient or odious manifestations of that dogma into a siding far away from any prying conscience. It appears very easy for some to be driven by their chosen world-view to the exclusion of facts, particularly those which may destabilise a perspective that places economic, educational rights above other equally important freedoms. Surely all are equal and interdependent?

Whatever the reasoning,  this issue lies at the core of feminist ideology, touching, as it does, on a woman’s rights to freedom-of-choice and control over her own our own body. Such fundamental freedoms do not exist under communist Chinese rule, the state’s needs are seen as greater than those of the individual. It’s fifteen years since delegates arrived in Beijing for the UN Conference fuelled by the noble vision of furthering women’s rights. During that time the systematic abuse against women has continued, making a mockery of the recommendations and agreements of the Platform-for-Action and Beijing Declaration. We were assured that involvement in the Beijing Conference would help moderate the grim excesses of China’s totalitarian machine and improve the plight of women. As was predicted by those organisations which boycotted the event, the violations resulting from the program have remain; forced sterilisations, torture, arbitrary arrests, forced abortions, and infanticide.

Yet however abhorrent this harrowing human rights record may be, what is equally offensive is the cold-blooded indifference which has greeted this issue. In keeping a shameful silence on the plight of Muslim-Uighur, Tibetan and Chinese women, those who are aware of this major violation of women’s rights are concealing these atrocities. The Commission on the Status of Women (and its associated NGO Committee) have consistently ignored and avoided this issue, and  refused to campaign in support of their sisters traumatized by the harrowing violence of China’s program of forced sterilizations. The traumatised women of  East Turkestan, Tibet and communist China have little to thank them for, and no reason to celebrate the forthcoming International Women’s Day.

If you find this post of interest it will be most helpful if you would kindly share on any social network/s which you may subscribe to. Use the buttons below to add the post so others may become aware of this issue. Many thanks

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 5, 2010 in Miscellaneous

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Japan Pressures China Over Suppression in East Turkestan

During a meeting between Japanese and Chinese Foreign Ministry officials in Tokyo today, Japan demanded that communist China guarantee human rights and fundamental freedoms to the Uyghur people,  and insisted that the tragic events in East Turkestan are an issue of international importance. More information here:

http://home.kyodo.co.jp/modules/fstStory/index.php?storyid=448683

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 9, 2009 in News Item

 

Tags: , , ,

Back From China Nancy Recalls Human Rights Values

Having discussed commerce and environmental issues with the communist Chinese leadership, Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, upon her return to the United States has regained her usually strident voice on human rights. Prior to her departure to Beijing she was rather silent on the subject.

On the twentieth commemoration of the Tiananmen Square massacre she addressed a gathering at Capitol Hill Washington DC, informing activists and fellow politicians that: “We will not rest until there is freedom of speech and assembly and openness in China and Tibet”.

Full speech here: http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/06-04-2009/0005038892&EDATE

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on June 4, 2009 in News Item

 

Tags: , , ,

Prague’s Trade Games Set To Ignore Tibet?

 

 

Will Klaus Appease Wen Jiabao By Keeping Silent on Tibet?

Will Klaus Appease Wen Jiabao By Keeping Silent on Tibet?

Image:people’sdaily

“We believe in democracy, we believe in liberty and liberty evermore”-Declaration of Czecho-Slovak Independence Paris October 18 1918

Will Czech President,Václav Klaus, honour his countries long association with principles of freedom and independence by challenging China on the issue of Tibet or East Turkestan, or will trade considerations prove a more alluring subject for discussion, during today’s scheduled meeting with communist China’s Premier?

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on May 20, 2009 in News Item

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

10th March Statement from Independent Tibet Network



 

 
 

Statement from Independent Tibet Network on the 50th Commemoration of the Lhasa Uprising of 1959. This declaration has been released to Tibetan organisations world-wide in recognition of the many thousands of Tibetans who lost their lives fighting for Tibetan independence and in solidarity with the people of Tibet, who continue their rightful struggle for nationhood, justice and freedom.

 
With the courageous sacrifices and inspiring actions that witnessed widespread uprisings for Tibet’s independence during March and April 2008 fresh in the memory, the Tibetan Government in Exile (TGIE) is intensifying its appeasement of communist China, through ever more conciliatory overtures. Having abandoned any notion of a separate political or territorial identity for its people the TGIE is now desperately seeking to resolve matters by accepting the dubious assurances within Communist China’s law on Regional Ethnic Autonomy. The ‘Memorandum on Genuine Autonomy for the Tibetan People’ (released on 16th November 2008 by the TGIE) is a breathtaking demonstration of surrender which casts a disgraceful stain upon the political aspirations of the Tibetans inside Tibet. A manifesto of stealthy capitulation, it arrogantly notes that: “To a very considerable extent Tibetan needs can be met within the constitutional principles on autonomy“. Praising the potential of China’s law on regional and ethnic autonomy it goes on to state that a number of discretionary powers within the regional framework “can be exercised to facilitate genuine autonomy for Tibetans” and happily describes Tibetans as an ‘ethnic minority’. Which flag will be flying over the Tibetan Assembly this March 10th?

Clearly the strategists of the TGIE consider that justice, prosperity , self-rule and freedoms can be achieved within communist China’s constitution, such ‘reasoning’ would equally have suggested that the occupied people’s of Europe would enjoy political and civil freedoms under Nazi occupation! In an effort to pursue this ‘strategy-of-the-madhouse‘, it proposes solutions wholly to the advantage of Beijing, and offered in a language saturated in dangerous compromise. Meanwhile it is painfully oblivious to the fact that achieving ‘genuine autonomy’, that most nebulous of conditions, whilst posing as much a challenge as obtaining independence, presents a number of immense risks and offers no guarantee of maintaining a distinct Tibetan cultural and territorial identity. Such considerations do not appear on the radar of those tasked with advancing negotiations with Beijing, who repeat the official mantra of autonomy.

The executions, torture and imprisonment that was waged upon Tibetans inside Tibet for daring to demand their independence during last year’s protests has not stirred the conscience of Tibet’s exiled administration, who have proved contemptuous and indifferent towards any voice which does not conform to its orthodoxy of capitulation. Meanwhile, adhering to an established pattern Beijing refuses to shift its position, unless ever more severe demands are conceded by the TGIE, whilst flatly rejecting the ‘autonomy proposals’ offered by the exiled Tibetan administration.

Despite such a public, formal rejection, voices urging surrender to China’s conditions remain, articulated most notably by Samdhong Rinpoche amongst other prominent Tibetans. Stumbling with eyes wide-open towards the abyss, the momentum to accept Chinese domination and to extinguish a sense of Tibetan political distinctiveness, tramples uncaringly over the common desire of ordinary Tibetans for nothing less than full independence. This is not the transparent democracy envisioned by the Dalai Lama, but the calculated application of traditional cultural and societal mechanisms in which the leadership is seen, in public at least, as without failings, whilst a carefully dispensed official propaganda, manipulates long established social perceptions and values, and ensures public conformity to the status quo.

Yet the pressure is growing upon the TGIE from within, the sense of disillusionment increases, particularly from younger Tibetans and those communities far removed from the suffocating deferential conventions which stifle any genuine dissent within Tibetan communities in India. Evidence of such frustration appears on chat-rooms and forums across the Internet as Tibetans express a profound dissatisfaction with their Exiled Government’s vacuous and fruitless policy of appeasement. This stagnant failure to produce any meaningful progress is viewed against the events of 2008 when Tibetans rose against Chinese occupation and demanded with one voice that Tibet be free and independent.

Such factors may well have sharpened minds within Dharamsala’s elite to produce the recent Special Meeting of Tibetans, partly public relations, mostly an exercise to endorse current efforts to encourage negotiations at any price. It was a curious gathering, with a somewhat slanted demographic, its participants, mostly middle-aged and uncritical loyalists of the TGIE. Its findings were seized upon by the Kashag, whose Statement (Issued 10th December 2008) selectively avoided any reference to the fact that there was a forceful opinion expressed within the meeting to return to the goal of Tibetan independence should no progress be shortly forthcoming. Instead it used the conclusions reached at the meeting to trumpet an emphatic endorsement of the ‘Middle Way’.

In reaching this judgement perhaps they failed to note the findings of their own ’census’ conducted inside Tibet, in which from a total of some 17 000 Tibetans only 2000 openly stated support for the ‘Middle Way’. The breakdown of the results revealed those favouring Independence as more than 5000, those following the Dalai Lama as some 8000, whilst the number of Tibetans supportive of autonomy numbered 2000. Even the Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament in Exile reportedly agreed that few in Tibet are in favour of that policy (Indian Express 18th November 2008).

Interestingly, the Special Meeting of Exile Tibetans was convened under Article 49 of the Tibetan Charter, a document which is very clear in its description of what constitute fundamental objectives: “The future Tibetan polity shall uphold the principle of non-violence and shall endeavour to be a Free Social Welfare State with its politics guided by the Dharma, a Federal Democratic Republic…”.(Article 3) That being so the question is raised as to how exactly the current policy of seeking so-called ‘genuine autonomy’ within the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China conforms to the formal objective detailed in the above Article of the Tibetan Charter.

Unless possessed of a thinking similar to the TGIE it is difficult to conceive that communist China’s constitution on Regional Ethnic Autonomy can accommodate principles of federalism, or democracy! Indeed communist China’s statutes on regional autonomy oppose any notion of separation of ‘nationalities’ through what is described as ‘local nationalism’, whilst Beijing forcefully rejected any suggestion of a federalist solution along the lines of Hong Kong. Can it be that in rushing to accept the draconian conditions of communist China’s law on regional and ethnic autonomy, which would in practice and law prevent any genuine enjoyment of democracy and federalism for Tibetans, the Central Tibetan Administration is now in conflict with a central objective of its own Charter? Or having surrendered Tibetan nationhood has the TGIE now discarded too its democratically agreed principles of seeking a democratic and federal Tibet, comprising all three regions? If so perhaps the exiled Tibetan authorities would care to provide details of when this was decided, an amendment to Article 3 requiring two thirds majority support from the Tibetan Assembly and the assent of the Dalai Lama. If no such amendment has been formalised through due democratic process, in accordance with the procedures detailed in the Charter, then the TGIE has not only violated its own state document, but grossly failed its people by undermining democratic process.

 Despite the visionary commitment by the Dalai Lama to democratise Tibetan society in what genuine, accountable and transparent process are Tibetans assured of any truly democratic participation? Their aspirations of nationhood surrendered by a presiding cabal, whose inane orthodoxy would abandon Tibet’s political and territorial freedoms for a settlement completely to the advantage of communist China.

Yet the TGIE ignores the lesson that history has written large, that there is no meaningful negotiation with tyranny. Incapable, as communist China is, of seeking an accord of understanding, mutual respect, tolerance and compromise, only one outcome is possible, unreserved submission.

The alternative carries formidable choices bearing inherent hazards and possibly suffering, yet no people have regained their nation’s freedom by offering compromise and abandonment to their oppressors. Unless communist China experiences some form of economic, social and political cataclysm, similar to that of the former Soviet Union, it is challenging to envision how Tibetans can break free (or operate a more forceful campaign of resistance) without having to examine questions of grave dimensions. As Tibetans assemble under the banner of their national flag to commemorate the events of 1959 they will be aware that the Tibet movement has reached a Rubicon moment, which if not responded too with acute political and strategic examination, plus an urgent replacement of present policies with a commitment to the political aspirations of the Tibetan people, will result in the cremation of Tibet’s historic and just claims in exchange for minority status under the brutal over-lordship of communist China.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 13, 2009 in Tibet

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,