Is Migrating To A ‘Little Tibet’ The Solution?

Image:archivenet

Four decades of Middle Way Approach (MWA) with no Genuine Autonomy in sight proves that it has failed.
There is something wrong with the key we have been using to unlock the Tibet issue. MWA Advocates in power ought to be more creative by compromising further as a way to realize a livable reality. The political administration of the Sakya Lamas, Phakdruks, Ripungs, Dhepa Tsangpa, Miwang Pholha and Gaden Phodrang from the 13th century up to the fall of Tibet in 1949/1959 did not reign beyond the Drichu River. Therefore any claim on Genuine Autonomy cannot stretch beyond the Drichu River. Period. Tibet that we know of today as chokasum (The three traditional regions of Tibet under the governance of a Tibetan government based in Lhasa) simply did not exist as one united political entity for the past eleven centuries! What can we do now?

The alternative is to drop the demand for Genuine Autonomy for Dhotoe, Dhomey and Utsang under one giant Tibetan administration over 2.5 million sq-km of territory, and instead demand Mini Autonomy on a landmass of just 100,000 sq-km around Kongpo and the adjoining areas to the west and east of it. Carve out a half moon map and call it Little Tibet in which Tibetans from different parts of the Tsenpo era Tibet can be relocated and yet remain a part of People’s Republic of China (PRC) while Beijing would still control defense and foreign affairs. The authority to enact laws or regulate migration of non-Tibetans to Little Tibet would rest solely in the hands of the Tibetans. PRC would fund the relocation.

Mini Autonomy is a high level of autonomy that is similar to the rights and freedom enjoyed by Hong Kong under one China two systems or Sikkim or even Ladak –the Little Tibet of India. Given the political reasoning of the MWA proponents that compromise is the key means available to strike a deal with PRC; this proposal is highly sensible and reasonable. Mutual agreement can be reached in a couple of years and Little Tibet can materialize in six years and the bardo of Uma and Rangzen (Proponents of autonomy within China and Tibetan independence respectively) will finally come to an end. What more can we ask?

This proposal is far more realistic than demanding Genuine Autonomy over 1/4 of the current Chinese Territorial size. PRC can never let go such a vast resourceful territory to a non-Han people whose population is less than 1/226 of the overall PRC population. Mini Autonomy over Little Tibet is definitely more practical than hoping for the grand Genuine Autonomy that has china losing everything and gaining nothing. If there is any basis of hope for Genuine Autonomy, why wouldn’t there be more basis of hope on Mini Autonomy over Little Tibet where the demand is over only 100,000 sq-km or just 4% of the 2.5 million sq-km of Tibet, and the remaining 2.4 million sq-km or 96% of the disputed territory is given up completely? Whether PRC blows up mountains in the given up areas for uranium or transfer to the valleys a Chinese population of 100 millions over night would be none of our business once an agreement is reached. PRC shall enjoy the vast Tibetan territory and its resources worth hundreds of trillions of dollars for the next millennium and beyond with no disruption or protest from us. This approach will silence the Chinese accusation that Tibetans are seeking independence in disguise. Producing this result will close down Rangzen camp for good and we shall all be reunited with our brethren in Little Tibet enjoying the fruits of Mini Autonomy. Meanwhile, Tibetans from every part of Tibet should start moving defiantly with their belongings including livestock to Little Tibet. Locals in Little Tibet should welcome them with tents pitched near their dwellings.

When PRC can squander $40 billion on a 16 day Olympic Games in 2008, the cost of relocation of less than 6 million Tibetans to Little Tibet is easy. The US relocated hundreds of thousands of refugees from Vietnam, Laos and other countries in the 70s across land, sea and air without any unbearable difficulties. PRC with GDP $12,610,000,000,000 can do it too. When more than 30 million Irish, Italians and Jews left their respective countries in Europe in the late 19th century and early 20th century and moved to the US with next to nothing on rickety boats on turbulent seas stretching over thousands of kilometers, the relocation of Tibetans on land within the same country is a simple task. With just about $100 billion to $200 billion, PRC can easily relocate six million Tibetans in 6000 concrete lasting buildings in Little Tibet. Of course, Tibetans can move to countryside if so wished. This is not an unbelievably huge sum for PRC and it’s a matter of taking one small decision on her part. In this venture, United Nations would also intermediate and help with funding, expertise, time and energy.

It is not far fetched to expect a donation of $1 billion to $ 5 billion from each major country that has remained silent on Tibet where justice has been brutally raped for over six decades without the slightest provocation or justification. Approximate $200 billion donation windfall can be fix deposited in a world bank for two reasons a) PRC cannot swindle it b) Use the interest earned annually on rebuilding Tibetan life in Little Tibet. History is a witness that none of them supported Tibetan independence or the Genuine Autonomy since the Chinese occupation in 1949. The European guilt that ensured an independent homeland for the Jews in Israel in 1947 should be extended to us at least in the form of Mini Autonomy over Little Tibet. Are we asking too much?

For Tibetans to relocate is not an issue for most of the Tibetans are or were nomads for centuries so to be on the move is nothing new, and to relocate one big time is no big deal. Nearly three thousand Tibet Tibetans on foot crossed over the 300km wide snow covered Tibetan Himalayan borders in mid winter to Nepal and India every year from 1980 to 2008 with the minimum clothing and no equipment whatsoever and majority of them walking their way back through the same route after tasting Dharamsala for awhile. Migrating to Little Tibet in freedom should be an indescribable joy. The fire that burns within the chest of every Tibetan including new comers inside India, Nepal , Bhutan  to migrate to the west at substantial personal cost, sometimes incurring debt as high as $40,000 per person is true and impressive from a business perspective. Moving to a stunning corner of your own known familiar country with a certain future with your own folks in charge should be even easier.

With each passing day we as a people are nearing extinction in our own land. Ironically, the threat of extinction comes not from the guns of the Chinese troops guarding the Himalayan borders in the distance but from the millions of innocent looking Chinese civilians in our villages and towns and cities. The Chinese population in Tibet is now estimated at 12 million to 15 million and it will continue to rise rapidly. Such massive Chinese population would engulf Tibetans in opportunity, modernization, education, jobs, language, business, sports, administration, trade, culture and politics and we will be forever at the receiving end in our own land. Mini Autonomy in Little Tibet will rescue us from this imminent threat. Since Little Tibet borders with Arunachal Pradesh in the south with a million inhabitants with whom we once shared history and culture, it raises two options, what they are I leave to your imagination, when geopolitical scenarios change in the future.

There are least 17 independent nations with less than 200 sq-km of land. At a first glance, 100,000sqkm of land mass may seem small and insignificant but this is not supposed to be the case when more than 110 sovereign nations and 29 non-sovereign nations with a population ranging from 1000 individuals to 50 million people who are not only surviving but flourishing economically, politically and even militarily in a landmass of less than 100,000 sq-km e.g. Hong Kong (1100),Taiwan (36,000), South Korea (100,000), UAE (84,000), Switzerland (40,000), Singapore (700), Netherlands (34,000), Kuwait (18,000), Israel (22,000), Ireland (70,000), Denmark (43,000), Bhutan (39,000), Belgium (31,000), and Austria (83,000). Mini Autonomy over Little Tibet with a population of less than 6 million Tibetans is no difficult matter at all to succeed.

Tibetan love for nature is legendary. Little Tibet is rich in minerals, flora, fauna, marine life, air life, fresh water with moderate climate all year round except a little cold in winter but certainly not colder than the freezing Dharamsala winter. With the development of Tibetan instinct for business and passion for education over the years, we can in an Autonomous Little Tibet produce tens of thousands of sharp masters and brilliant Phd’s with a zeal for community progress and creativity, the most important goal of learning and education. Focus on education and business will eventually ensure our political brain power which is behind the fire power that defeats overwhelming manpower as we witness in the Israel- Arab scenario.

Buddhism being central to the Tibetan life, Tibetan population of less than six million will not see rapid rise as many Tibetans given the freedom and free facilities will become monks and nuns quite happily. Polyandry, unprotected sex, promiscuous sexual culture, aids, hepatitis B will slow down our population growth. With the rise in career consciousness, our population will increase slow and steady.  Our population which was estimated at 10 million in the 7th century, today after 1300 years, when it should be 60 million, is only less than 6 million. With a small population to take care of, the strain on Little Tibet for its natural resources will not be unbearable for some centuries.

Located in Tibet Autonomous Region with Lhasa in the North West and Arunachal Pradesh in the South East, Kongpo is one of the most important cradles of ancient Tibetan civilization having been settled as early as five thousand years ago. It is famed for its ancient verdant mountainous terrain and clear waterways. It is indeed a great location to practice and preserve our identity, language, freedom, Buddhism and culture, and while at the same time benefiting from Chinese economic prosperity. This is the ideal spot from where the Dalai Lama can realize his idea of spiritual sanctuary for humanity in distress, a zone of Ahimsa (peace) from which the Dalai Lama can inject reality into his dreams of universal responsibility and harmony of world religions.

According to a renowned Tibetan historian Lobsang Shastri based in New York, Nyatri Tsenpo- the first Tibetan king, was born and bred in Kongpo! Also for the faith driven there are numerous pilgrimage sites including holy hot springs, waterfalls, lakes and rivers, sacred mountains, and the trails of Guru Rinpoche, Thangthong Gyalpo, Dorjee Phagmo and also the famous Kongpo Ben Rock! Yarlung Tsangpo River also cuts through the Kongpo making the famous Yarlung Tsangpo Canyon which is 496 kilometers long and is four times deeper than the Grand Canyon in America. 16,000 feet deep! It is, in fact, the deepest canyon in the world and this fact alone can ignite a mega tourist industry for self sustenance, peace and prosperity. 20,000 sq-km of the southern Little Tibet can be declared a wildlife sanctuary protecting world’s endangered species from wild yak (the symbol of Tibetan freedom) to magnificent tigers, generating extra revenue through wild life tourism while also helping the world become less poor and less ugly. What a double contribution, one at local level and the other at global Dharmic level!

Those who may feel emotionally betrayed because of the perception that your local land is given up need not feel so. Whether it is Siling in Amdo or Chamdo in Kham or Lhasa in Utsang, they all belong to all the Tibetans and not just to the locals. Similarly, Kongpo and the adjoining areas belong not just to Kongpowas or Pemakoepas or Zayulpas or Lobas but to all Tibetans. What is given up to PRC and what is demanded from PRC belongs to all of us Tibetans equally. For now the fact remains we do not possess control over an inch of our land and the independence struggle has been abandoned for four decades and no Genuine Autonomy in sight. Everything in Tibet is Chinese for six decades now.  The walls are closing in on us. No amount of petty immature internal bickering will make this eventuality go away. Find a way and adapt or die.

However beautiful and realistic Little Tibet may sound, it will not come about voluntarily. In politics, there is no such thing as free lunch and we have to struggle for every scrap of it. And in the absence of a top down and a bottom up struggle in the true sense of the word, not even 1 sq-km of the barren Jangthang will be given to us for underneath that small piece of land, feeling no threat whatsoever from us, the Chinese occupier sees, regardless of whether it exists or not, oil worth $10 trillion. A war between India, Japan, and the US on one side, with China on the other side of the power spectrum can result in any possibilities in our favor but for the foreseeable future such a mega war is highly unlikely due to mutual vulnerability of nuclear proportions. Whatever the case might be, we cannot afford to wait praying any longer.

The birth of Little Tibet will come about when each and every Tibetan recognizes the necessity of fulfilling this humble and yet realistic vision, it will come about when we realize Mini Autonomy is like the air we breathe, the first and foremost requirement for our survival. That it will come about when we reject blind faith and the emotional blackmailing from our leaders. That it will come about when we reject apathy as bliss and cronyism as getting smart. That it will come about when we embrace critical thinking, rationality, and problem solving skill. That only through nonviolent action, hardship, sacrifice, militant action and diplomacy can freedom be won eventually. In my final post on this, I will share with you the practical ways and means to get there. Until then stay glued!

The author is a Tibetan American who formerly served with the US Armed Forces as an active duty member. He can be reached at milarangzen@gmail.com

6 thoughts on “Is Migrating To A ‘Little Tibet’ The Solution?

  1. FreeTibet says:

    THIS IS PRC IDEA. NONE SENCE CHINESE SECRET SOLUTION. WETHE TIBETANS ARE FIGHTING FOR OUR LAND, NOT FOR OUR SURVIVAL. LAND MEANS EVERY THING, OUR HISTORY , PEOPLES , OLD PRECIOUS MONASTRIES, TEMPLES ,CASTELS AND CULTURE. WE ARE NOT FOOLISH AS YOU COMMUNIST .

    • Free Tibet, thanks for your comments.Anyone who reads our Blog and sees the content, our campaigns and commitment to Rangzen will be very aware we are not supporting the communist Chinese regime. Did you realize that the article has been written by a Tibetan, who is named and includes an email address. If you feel he has communist sympathies perhaps contact him directly with your concerns.

  2. Tseten Zöchbauer says:

    Forget it! What are you suggestion?! A Tibet Reservationlike the Natives in USA or an National Park with Tibetan species playing free State for Tourists? …

  3. Migmar dorjee says:

    Relocating the people from one place to another place is not in the interest of public and will never be changed as long as people consider their birth place a mother or a father (land). I think the author of this article has no emotion attached with his birth place. The best is middle way approach shown by HHDL. It is the only way by which all three provinces of tibet will be united and agreed upon. No other alternatives.

    • Dorjee, thanks for your contribution, while you have every entitlement to claim MWA is the only solution, do remember that inside occupied Tibet the Tibetan resistance is demanding independence.

  4. Disgusting is the most tolerant word that could be attributed to the above article. It’s some sort of degenerative compromising opportunism at it’s best. The true solution is a complete freedom with the ownership of all the assets – cultural, environmental as well as geographical – that belong to the Tibetans by the Tibetans. And it could be achieved by the Tibetans only in unison with the struggle of the people of china by throwing away the red imperialists from power. It’s true that the Clergy is simply wasting time in the name of middle path. What is required is the peoples movement for total freedom.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s