Greenpeace Ignores Tibet’s Nuclear Poisoning

greenpeace ignores nuclear poisoning of tibet

The world’s most high profile environmental organization, with a network of international offices and serious resources at its disposal is investing considerable time, effort, thought and finances into developing its Greenpeace-China operations.

With headquarters in Beijing and Hong Kong, it campaigns on a range of environmental issues in China, including industrial, agricultural, water and atmospheric pollution. Yet one area of significant environmental concern in China and occupied territories such as Tibet and East Turkestan, which Greenpeace-China does not campaign upon, is nuclear issues. It would appear that Greenpeace does not recognize the existence the considerable ecological damage caused by nuclear production, and uranium mining and the disposal of radioactive waste within China and the occupied territories of Tibet and East Turkestan.

map showing east turkestan, tibet and inner mongolia

Visit their website: http://www.greenpeace.org/china/en/ and you will see a complete absence of any reference to China related nuclear and radioactive pollution! This strange omission naturally raises the question, does Greenpeace consider its work inside China of such importance that it’s willing to operate a political compromise to placate the communist Regime’s sensitivities on its expanding nuclear activities?

Mainland China has 20 nuclear power reactors in operation, 28 under construction, and more are scheduled, which intend to produce a sixfold increase in China’s nuclear capacity. Yet, as Greenpeace exercises anti-nuclear protests around the world

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/nuclearpower/8935168/Greenpeace-activists-invade-French-nuclear-plant-sites.html

http://live.kyero.com/2011/02/16/greenpeace-protest-at-valencia-nuclear-plant/

http://ctestp.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20090312/090312_nuclear_protest?hub=CP24Home

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gfskPx3_-gtmXaJb3KCBal94OdRg

http://www.robedwards.com/2008/08/greenpeace-risked-deaths-in-anti-nuclear-protest.html

it appears completely indifferent to the massive growth of nuclear plants and uranium mining inside China, and the hazardous environmental impact they pose. Nor does it appear troubled by the worrying standards which operate within China’s nuclear industry:

http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/0327/china.html

Currently a heavy importer of uranium, China is engaged in a determined effort to secure deposits within territory under its control. Significant amounts of the ore have been located in Eastern Tibet in Amdo (so-called Qinghai Province particularly in so-called Gansu Province). The China National Nuclear Corp operates in that region, and in 2008 agreed a new contract for further exploration http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/ENF-CNNC_to_develop_uranium_deposits_in_Qinghai-1707085.html

“The laborers have no understanding of health protection or prevention.Those kids sit on the uranium ore to smoke and eat their steamed buns, and at night they even set up their cots inside  and sleep in the uranium caves. I’ve told them that stuff could give people lung cancer, but they don’t understand any of it.”.

(Comments of mine employee working at No. 792 Mine located in Gansu’s so-called Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, one of China’s most important bases for uranium. This area was historically part of Tibet’s Amdo Region)

All forms of uranium mining, and the milling of ore, generate serious environmental hazards to the hydrosphere and atmosphere, waste deposits often dumped into heaps release radioactive dust particulates into the atmosphere and pollute a huge area. Two methods in particular, which are used in China, cause grave concern.’Leaching’ and ‘open pit’ extraction of uranium have resulted in radioactive contamination of soils and rivers. Not that Greenpeace appears troubled, despite these forms of mining posing a grave health-risk. Details of these mining methods, their environmental impacts, and health risks may be viewed on a slideshow here:

http://www.wise-uranium.org/stk.html?src=stkd01e&show=t

Also you can view a trailer of ‘Posion Wind’:

“tells the personal stories and struggle of several the Indigenous people living in the southwest USA from the 1940’s to today. Set against the desert landscape and focuses on lives being destroyed by Uranium mining and testing. The effects of prolonged radiation within Native American communities, and workplaces”.

http://www.poisonwindmovie.com/

A similar destruction is being visited upon the Tibet and East Turkestan (Between 1964 and 1996, China used East Turkestan [so-called Xinjiang] for all of its nuclear testing. The Christian Science Monitor reported that the 45 official nuclear tests led to radiation poisoning that resulted in an estimated 210,000 deaths. However, it has been reported that secret nuclear testing has also been going on with grave effects on the health of the people in the surrounding areas. An investigative report by London’s newspaper, The Independent, revealed that the areas surrounding the Lop Nor nuclear test site—on the eastern edge of the Taklamakan Desert—have a cancer rate that is 35 percent higher than the rest of China and higher than average rates of Leukemia, tumors, and birth defects such as cleft palates.

Uighur Infant Suffers From China's Fall-Out

Uighur Infant Suffers From China’s Fall-Out

Image Courtesy of: ETIC

A UK television documentary ‘Death on The Silk Road’ (Channel Four 1998) secretly filmed inside East Turkestan documented a range of illnesses linked to radiation exposure. Yet Greenpeace keeps a shameful silence, even though it would be aware of the detailed material which continues to document the extent and nature of environmental problems resulting from China’s nuclear industry, both commercial and military.

Greenpeace too has been disappointingly silent on the case of the courageous environmentalist Mr. Sun Xiaodi, who has researched and exposed serious radioactive pollution in the so-called Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Gansu Province (part of Tibet’s eastern region of Kham). It would be reasonable to imagine that Greenpeace would have supported Sun’s actions and featured the appalling pollution in that part of Tibet. Sadly it chooses to ignore the plight of this inspirational campaigner, who reports suggest remains under house arrest for his activities. As Sun, the former nuclear pant worker testified to the 2006 Indigenous World Uranium Summit http://www.minesandcommunities.org/article.php?a=25

“The No. 792 Uranium Mine (Gansu, Kham in Eastern Tibet) is one of the highest yielding uranium mines in China. Just a couple of days ago, under the cover of night, while the local Tibetans were all asleep, the mine as usual dumped untreated irradiated water straight into the Bailong River, a tributary of the Yangtze. At present, in our region, there are an unusually high number of miscarriages and birth defects, with many children born blind or malformed. But the mine authorities have military backgrounds; our local Party secretary and mine director once said to me, “Get on the wrong side of us, and the birds will be picking your bones!”

STATEMENT

Tibettruth considers that Greenpeace’s silence on nuclear issues within China to be a serious violation of its own operating objectives and commitments and to be an unprincipled appeasement of the communist government of China. Moreover by not opposing and campaigning on such issues Greenpeace is guilty of complicity in the ecological and environmental suffering of Tibetan and Uighur people. While Greenpeace may argue that constructive engagement with China will bring environmental progress, it should not be at the expense of a major issue such as this. Nor should the environmental condition of the peoples of Tibet and East Turkestan be ignored in preference for fostering positive relations with the communist Chinese authorities. Furthermore there remain serious questions as to the realism of establishing an effective, transparent and independent environmental movement, within what is a draconian and totalitarian system. Under China’s authoritarian regime environmentalism is subject to particularly acute state scrutiny. See HERE

ACTION NOW

Email Greenpeace

Email Greenpeace

Email your concerns to Greenpeace Executive Director Mr Kumi Naidoo kumi.naidoo@int.greenpeace.org

Or to Greenpeace-China Executive Director, Dr.Mario Damato greenpeace.china@greenpeace.org