Tourism-Exploiting Tibet And Manipulating Tourists

Tibet Tourism Profit And Propaganda For China

Image:archivenet

Communist China’s efforts to ruthlessly exploit Tibet’s culture for the purpose of propaganda and profit continue unchecked, not content with marketing Tibet‘s challenging and beautiful landscape (well the truncated and annexed fabrication it calls the Tibet Autonomous (sic) Region) as some form of Shangri-la playground; for eco-tourists, climbers, cyclists, canoeists, hikers and photographers (or anyone else so possessed of selfishness that they are prepared to overlook the tyranny in order to gain some exotic experience) the communist authorities are assiduously marketing Tibetan culture as a key commercial enterprise. Having invaded, annexed and violently suppressed Tibet and its people, in true colonialist fashion it is now engaged in profiting from supposedly authentic cultural enterprises by manipulating and exploiting foreign (and Chinese) tourists. It is a reminder of the humiliating tragedy that befell the native cultures of North America, their traditions and lifestyle assaulted by a vicious and intolerant colonizer, gaoled within the crippling misery of reservations, a fate which is being which is being enacted upon Tibet’s nomads who are being forced to live in what are effectively concentration settlements.

Tibetan Performers Entertain Tourists Dressed In Ersatz Tibetan Costumes Featuring The Red and Yellow of China's Flag

Those sepia images of native American peoples, that performed in any number of ’Wild West Shows’, retain a disturbing resonance today. Forced through oppression and conquest to scratch a living by displaying their horsemanship or ritual dancing to the beery applause of the very people who had stolen and eroded their lands and culture. The photographic archive of those times reveals, not only the dark stain upon the history of the United States, but graphically exposes the cynical and exploitative nature of colonization and arrogant imperialism of the dominant power. As evidenced by China’s actions inside occupied Tibet such expansionist corruption is not consigned to those yellowing pages of history, Tibetans are facing a similar shameless process, that seeks to extract maximum profit, through the callous perversion of Tibetan culture. Nowhere is the this more nauseatingly demonstrated perhaps than in the so-called National Minorities Park in Beijing, in which China’s grotesque parade of peoples it has subjugated is paraded for the questionable appreciation of tourists, who consume the lies without question, knowledge or worse, conscience.

Tibetan Culture Draped In China's Flag For Tourist Consumption

Image:archivenet

Apart from the commercial advantages of promoting Tibetan culture, the Chinese regime is always keen to seek maximum propaganda advantage too for presenting its occupation in a positive light, by peddling the usual disinformation mantra of improved economic educational and health for Tibetans, since the jackbooted arrival of China’s storm troopers in 1949. It recognizes the value of tourism in that context and China’s Department of Propaganda has been unsleeping in its efforts to encourage visitors to occupied Tibet, knowing that perceptions and attitudes may be shaped to conform to the ideological lie that is China’s version of Tibet. A significant component of that sly conjuration is to exploit Tibetan culture and present a Sinocized version that echoes the official propaganda, corrupting and exaggerating authentic Tibetan customs into a theme park performance. Indeed Tibetan towns like Lhasa and Shigatse have become little more than entertainment venues in which tourists are moved around a number of precisely controlled and presented stages, removed from the grim reality of China’s oppression of Tibet, while carefully exposed to images approved by the occupying regime.

Central to that effort is the illusion of a vibrant and happy Tibetan culture, to endorse and legitimise the baseless claims made by China that its rule in occupied Tibet is benign and beneficial. “In Lhasa, we and our companions stayed in a stylish hotel with all that one would expect from a world-class facility. By appearance, the personnel were entirely Han. Our city tour guide was Han. Our bus drivers were Han. The people on the streets of Lhasa seemed to be 75 percent Han except inside the Jokhang Temple and in a small, two-block-long, open air market near the Temple. In the circuit around the Temple Chinese run all the high-end shops and almost all the outside trinket stalls.” (Testimony From Ms Linda Thom Foreign Tourist To Occupied Tibet 2007)

Fake Tibetan Trinkets Sold By Chinese Owned Traders Dominate Lhasa

Visitors are also China’s ‘useful idiots’ in that they have a potential to disseminate propaganda fabrications among family, friends, colleagues, and more significantly across social network platforms such as Facebook and Twitter and upon personal Blogs. Yet those considering visiting occupied Tibet should realize that tourism is a significant contributor to China’s colonization, securing employment and business opportunities for its colonizers. Moreover, it is a powerful tool of manipulation and disinformation that serves China’s objectives to affirm Tibet as being an inalienable part of China.Assisting the creation of a perverse mirage of contented Tibetans, seemingly free to enjoy their culture. Beyond the satisfied myopia of the tourist however the erosion and exploitation of Tibet’s traditions, including its very language continues apace. The suffocating excesses of Chinese occupation has forced Tibetans into extreme choices, similar to that experienced by native peoples of America who were given stark options by the colonizing white man. As with the plight of those peoples, Tibetans face educational, health, economic and cultural apartheid, having become tourist curious in their own land, some are forced into an industry that exploit the very culture from they sprang. Their movements restricted, religion under assault and denied civil and political freedoms, the people of Tibet are witness to a cold-hearted profiteering of their lifestyle as tourism spreads, bringing with it a range of additional social problems and ever more Chinese settlers.

Image:archivenet

The cultural genocide that is being waged against Tibet has been accelerated to dangerous levels of intensity with the construction of the railway from so-called Qinghai (actually annexed Tibetan region of Amdo and parts of Kham) to Lhasa. Since its opening in 2006 it’s presence has permitted and encouraged a massive increase of Chinese tourists and migrants to the Tibetan capital, 4.38 million up to 2010, according to official Chinese sources. Foreign tourists boarding the train will not realize that the railway serves too as an economic and security artery maintaining China’s despotic military grip over the region. It is not so well known that the rail line’s communication system itself is part of China’s surveillance and intelligence network, called Golden Shield, which monitors and processes information on untold millions. Nor are the some 12, 000 tourists and colonizers brought each day to Lhasa normally aware of the military posts which line the rail route, another strategic reason for the line’s creation.

Image:archivenet

“The train we rode had a capacity for 885 passengers and was about 85 percent full. The Chinese run eight trains in and eight trains out of Tibet daily which means that 12,000 riders come and go each day. My husband and I guessed, by observation of all cars, that our train carried about 90 percent Han Chinese, perhaps 5 percent ‘long noses‘ (Europeans) and the remainder Tibetans.” (Testimony of Linda Thom foreign tourist in occupied Tibet 2007)

Tourism is a major component of China’s effort to further exploit and undermine Tibetan national identity and culture, it benefits virtually entirely the colonizers, marginalizing even further Tibetans. It insidiously promotes China’s propaganda and seeks to legitimise its baseless claim over Tibet by manipulating tourists and presenting distorted images of Tibet’s culture. Visitors to occupied Tibet should in no way consider they have witnessed the real Tibet, instead they are exposed to a cynically constructed and ersatz distortion of Tibetan culture, while the genuine traditions of Tibet are suppressed and eroded. Rather than becoming willing collaborators in that odious process those contemplating a vacation to occupied Tibet should ask themselves if they wish to stand in solidarity with Tibetans in Tibet, who resist the assault upon their culture and denial of national freedom, or endorse and support China’s occupying regime by sustaining and encouraging the colonization of Tibet.

Please Share This Article On The Social Network Sites Below

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

China Manipulating Canada’s First Nations

Image:afn

In August 2010 a delegation of Chinese government officials and businessmen representing ‘tourist enterprises’ from so-called Qinghai Province (actually a region comprised of Tibetan lands known as Amdo and Kham) were part of a trade mission that targeted a group of Canada’s native peoples. The delegation visited the Stó:lō Nation in a cynical effort to see how profit could be maximised from exploiting native culture through tourism. The trip was though not entirely about how much money could be extracted by milking Tibet’s suppressed culture through crass tourism projects. In a calculated political move communist China’s regime has often sought to link the issues and challenges experienced by first peoples of  North America with Tibetans, using the history of the oppression of native peoples as a rebuke to criticism from the United States over the plight of Tibetans under Chinese occupation.

While there may be interesting parallels between the American colonization of native people and China’s annexation and exploitation of Tibet, like any comparison it’s not advised to interpret such as exact.  It is no accident that China’s propaganda machine associates Tibetans with Native Americans, as it seeks to implant negative suggestions. As noted by Warren S Smith Jr. in his excellent work, ’Tibet’s Last Stand?’ : “This is in fact  a favorite analogy of the Chinese and their apologists because it implies inevitability, a natural replacement of a primitive culture by one more advanced, and a precedent implicating China’s American critics in the same crime of which China is accused” 

Seems the party were extended a warm welcome by the Stó:lō Nation, and Canadian enterprise bodies, who presumably applauded when it was announced that there was “a remarkable similarity between the interests and aspirations of Tibetan people living in Qinghai (sic)” . Perhaps it went unnoticed among those in attendance that those aspirations are to rid Tibet of China’s colonizers and restore Tibetan independence. Nor apparently did anyone question the ethics of receiving a delegation from an oppressive totalitarian regime such as China’s, that is viciously oppressing Tibetan culture. Indeed it is irony beyond any known scale that a people such as the Stó:lō Nation, whose freedoms, culture and lands were colonized and exploited welcomed with open arms representatives of a regime which is itself exploiting and violating the cultural traditions of Tibetans.

Such issues did not appear to concern either the Canadian International Development Agency nor Stó:lō Nation President Chief Joe Hall who reportedly dispatched a message claiming First Nations are open for business with China: “The government of Canada have often closed doors for a variety of reasons,” Hall’s message said. “We need to impress on you that we are the true land title holders.” According to reports the Chinese delegation also visited a number of tourist enterprises including  Quaaout Lodge, a resort owned by the Little Shuswap Indian Band, and Siska Nation.

Beijing has been making some calculated moves to exploit connections with First Nations, who at times seem to have been blinded by a Chinese charm offensive and perhaps the allure of commercial profit?

“As a result of this historic journey I believe the Chinese understand us much better and respect our culture. The feeling is mutual. I have been made to feel at home here and feel a special kinship that transcends generations,” said Chief Morley Googoo of Nova Scotia’s Waycobah First Nation. While Grand Chief Morris Shannacappo, praised his communist Chinese hosts by stating that:  “We have the utmost respect for ancient Chinese culture and civilization and we were so pleased that our sincere respect was genuinely reciprocated,”.

It is a grave error of judgement and highly troubling in terms of moral principal that some within Canada’s First Nations appear willing to engage in business with communist China’s regime, whose violent oppression and exploitation of Tibetan culture has caused colossal suffering and tragedy. It is to be hoped that wiser counsel will prevail within the leadership of the First Nations and  that they can show solidarity with their brothers and sisters in side occupied Tibet whose traditions and freedoms are brutally denied and abused by China.
 

Urgent Action

Please email a link to this article to the Assembly of First Nations (AFN)  addresses below and express your concern that about China’s exploitation of Tibet through tourism  which benefits Han Chinese businesses and workers who are colonizing occupied Tibet, Ask Ms. Jody Wilson-Raybould AFN Regional Chief, British Columbia to stand in solidarity with the Tibetan people, and support their culture by calling upon fellow First Nations peoples not to engage  in any business which sustains and encourages the exploitation and suppression of Tibetan culture.

Jody Wilson Raybould may be contacted here Marcia.guno@bcafn.ca
Contact directly the Stó:lō Nation here http://www.stolonation.bc.ca/about-us/contact-us.htm
Email too Rick Simon, Regional Chief of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland  c/o denise_mcdonald@hotmail.com

Please share this article on any of the social networks below

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Testimony Of A Tibetan Hero

Recently colleagues, who very ably run Tibettruth’s Twitter site, report that a small number of people appear to be uncertain, or confused, as to the nature of the Tibetan struggle, some articulating that Tibetans are protesting for rights such as language or economic or educational equality. Others have been tweeting on a video extract, showing the courageous 2007 protest by Khamba Tibetan nomad,  Mr. Ronggay A’drak,  that disappointingly failed to reveal that Ronggay didn’t just call for a return of Dalai Lama, but demanded Tibet’s independence. Having taken that action, knowing the terrifying consequences, for western organizations and supposed supporters to carefully expunge reference to his demand for Tibetan national freedom is a sickeningly callous  betrayal of his sacrifice.

Ronggay A’drak Faced Chinese Torture To Demand Tibetan Independence

Image:tchrd

In a effort to clarify and confirm the objective of the Tibetan cause, as determined by Tibetans inside that occupied nation, Tibettruth presents the following testimony. Although this statement is from 2001, it is one of many incredible examples of resistance to Chinese rule that continues today, and is a valid and accurate reflection of what Tibetans in Tibet are struggling for: Tibet’s rightful independence, and the return of HH The Dalai Lama.

An Appeal from the core of my heart To His Holiness the Dalai Lama, and all fellow Tibetan brethren.

My name is Keri Nyima Drakpa (sked ri’i nyima grags pa) and I’m a Tibetan youth from Tawu County of the Kham region of Tibet. Just as the saying goes: “Although small, a marmot has all his physical attributes complete”, similarly, though I am neither a scholar full of wisdom, nor a man known for his wealth, I’m someone with a boundless love and concern for my own nationality. I have always been concerned with, and given much thought to, our nationality’s state of absolute backwardness and that under the oppression of the ruling classes, we don’t even have the right to use our own language etc. This represents a denial of human rights and deprives us of any degree of political authority. At the same time, having studied and absorbed the glorious historical accounts of how our ancestors had exercised political authority and ruled the country, I made a firm resolution that, if necessary, I would definitely sacrifice my own life for the sake of my nationality. Thus, with unfeigned sincerity, wishing that my fellow Tibetan nationals could enjoy proper freedom, and desperately hoping that a separate Tibetan country could be established, I wrote many posters demanding that, “ All Chinese should return to their hometowns and allow Tibet to be independent.”

I put them up on the end as well as side walls of the District Government buildings on 7th January 2000, 9th April 1998, 10th November 1999, 12th November 1999, 19th November 1999, 6th December 1999 and 29th December 1999. At the end of each poster I signed my name clearly. However, ill fated that I am, before I had managed to accomplish a single objective, my precious life seemed doomed to be ended at the hands of the cruel and repressive Chinese. Last year, on the 22nd of March, when I was in Lhasa, four members of the Tawu Public Security Bureau officers arrived and arrested me immediately. Right from the start, without even asking me a single question, they started beating me like beating a drum and rendered me incapable of uttering even a word. They gave me neither a mouthful of food nor a drop of water to drink, and immediately took me in a plane back to Chengdu. Upon arrival in Chengdu, they let a few Chinese police officers beat me up. Those reincarnations of the black devil himself, in the form of Chinese cadres, pinned me down and beat me so mercilessly that I became half dead and half alive. At the time, I fell unconscious.

When I regained consciousness, it was around eleven at night. I sensed that my whole body hurt with excruciating pain and it was impossible to move properly. In particular, I realised that both my legs had turned numb and were devoid of any sensation. Ten days after we had arrived in Tawu, they started interrogating me. Despite the intense and excruciating pain all over my body, ill fated though I was, I managed to tell them exactly everything that I deeply believe and feel in my heart, and acknowledged that I had indeed written all those posters. Therefore, last year on October 5th, the Court in Kardze Tibet Autonomous Prefecture, sentenced me to a prison term of nine years. However, I’m now in such a decrepit state that I cannot eat even a mouthful of food, and my legs, too, are rendered lame by the cruel Chinese. As such, I know that before long I am going to die. I am certainly not afraid to die. As the last breath of the life of this ruddy-faced Tibetan is about to cease, let this appeal be relayed to my maternal uncle, Jowo Kyab, or to fellow Tibetan brethren who cherish and value the interest and cause of our Tibetan nationality, to ensure that through the good offices of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, China’s bullying, cruel treatment and legal punishments of Tibetan people like me is made widely known among the international community of the world. And besides, I appeal to my fellow Tibetan brethren with whom I share the same flesh and bone, you must know and understand the truth about how China mistreats us through unreserved bullying, illegal and immoral actions. We must unite at all costs and rise up against China.

Keri Nyima Drakpa Dated April 1, 2001

Please share this information on any of the social sites you may use below

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Walk Alone Liverpool-With Your Head Held High

Image:archivenet

Liverpool’s soccer club faces a red revolution as reports emerge that communist China’s national investment arm China Investment Corporation (CIC), is set to purchase the club from its American owners George Gillett and Tom Hicks, who have presided over the club’s massive debt. No longer a sport of the common man man in England, soccer has come under control of big, and at times dirty buisness, with the Football Association and Premier League to regulate, what some commentators have questioned is a corrupt, and bankrupt game dominated by television, advertising and transfer finance. In an effort to addresses serious issues of ownership of clubs the English Premier League and the Football Association operates “fit and proper persons” assessment that promises more transparency over club finances and ownership, as part of a package of measures drawn up in response to English government calls for the game to “reassess its relationship with money”.

This development emerged after the serious concerns surrounding the purchase of Manchester City soccer club in 2007, which lead to a prominent human rights group lobbying the Premier League to challenge former President of Thailand, Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra’s right to own Manchester City. Human Rights Watch (HRW) claimed that Thaksin was “a human rights abuser of the worst kind” and should not have passed the League’s ‘fit and proper person’ test. The allegations were denied by. Mr Thanksin and since then the club has passed into new ownership.

Mr. Jian-hua Huang

Image:guardian

Well if Human Rights Watch had concerns regarding the human rights record of that individual one wonders what its position will be towards the prosppect of communist China becoming owner of an English soccer team? While there has been much spin to present the China Investment Corporation as being some form of independent operator, Liverpool fans should be informed that no organization, and ceratinaly not one tasked with globally investing China’s soverign funds, operates without the sanction, control or influence of the communust regime in China. In effect if Liverpool Chairman, Martin Broughton allows the sale of the club to Chinese businessman Mr Jian-hua Huang (called Kenny by his Western friends) then Liverpool Football CLub will become the property of Communist China, a totalitarian state that inflicts a wide range of human rights violations, including mass programs of forced sterilizations, violentlyoppresses the occupied peoples of Tibet and East Turkestan, while brutally suppressing free speech, civil, political and religious freedoms.

The English Premier League cannot in all good conscience ignore the harrowing atrocities and machinery of state terror that characterize the communist Chinese Regime, nor can the administration of Liverpool be so blinded by the prospect of economic security that ethical and moral values are abandoned in exchange for China’s blood money. The club and its fans deserve more than this.

If you find this post of interest it will be most helpful if you would kindly share on any social network/s which you may subscribe to. Use the buttons below to add the post so others may become aware of this issue. Many thanks

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

China’s Propaganda Offensive At A College Near You

Image:archivenet

Strange how China exerts such a peculiar hold over the thinking  of political, educational and media establishments world wide, of course commercial factors are hugely dominant and influential for nations entranced by China’s economic allure. However that does not fully explain the degree of accommodation and tolerance extended by the west towards China, an attitude which perhaps has its roots in Orientalism. Admittedly there is much within China’s culture to admire, yet the stench of its blood-soaked tyranny, the censorship, oppression and violent occupation of Tibet and East Turkestan is an ever present distraction that shadows a full appreciation of its diverse and rich traditions. Anyone possessed of integrity and normal intelligence would surely find it challenging not to measure say the enlightened ancient wisdom of the Daoist master Lao Tze against the brutal denial of civil, religious and civil freedoms which have paralyzed China since 1949.

Of course there  those argue that such distinctions can be balanced and Chinese cultural riches celebrated and enjoyed, despite the more odious realities that dominate life in China and occupied territories such as Tibet. That position does of course raise ethical concerns in that such a view either chooses to ignore or relegate the suffering and oppression resulting from China’s regime, by elevating cultural appreciation above human rights and freedom. Through some mental conjuration the executions, forced sterilizations, torture and slave labour camps are shunted off into some dark sidings of indifference, so that full attention may be directed at whatever facet of Chinese culture is being valued or experienced.  It is no accident that as part of its unsleeping propaganda efforts communist China, aware of this willingness to be dazzled by the finery of Chinese culture, engages in a carefully orchestrated  public relations strategy that draws upon western fascination with the more aesthetic elements of Chinese society.

Image:archivenet

An insidious and  prominent example of this propagandizing is firmly embedded across a swathe of universities, schools, colleges and other educational establishments courtesy of a controversial project known as the Confucius Institute. A body whose headquarters are in Beijing, not surprising given it is an official arm of the communist Chinese Government‘s, Office of Chinese Language Council International. This public institution has as it central aim the promotion of Chinese language and culture and operates worldwide, however unlike similar cultural based organizations such as Germany’s Goethe Institute or France’s Alliance Française, the Confucius Institute operates as an important part of totalitarian regime, with a key mission to promote a more positive image of China abroad. As such it has attracted considerable concern, having extended its somewhat cancerous tentacles across educational establishments around the world, it has been charged with promoting Chinese government views. “Jocelyn Chey, a visiting professor at Sydney and former diplomat, regards the Confucius Institutes as a propaganda vehicle for the Chinese communist party, and negatively influencing academic staff”.

Image:archivenet

While governments too have expressed unease at the nature and degree of negative influence, including Sweden which was alarmed the organization was simply a vehicle for Chinese government information. The security services too of a number of countries have been monitoring the Confucius Institute with some alarm, most publicly Canada’s CSIS. A former Asia Bureau Chief of the CSIS noted: “I think there’s a concern from an intelligence point of view, definitely,” said Michel Juneau-Katsuya. “These Confucius organizations have not come out of philanthropic ideals, they are part of a strategy. And they are funded and run by organizations that are linked to Chinese intelligence services.”. India too has expressed serious concern and refused to permit any such offices to be established on Indian territory fearful that they were simply a smokescreen for Chinese propaganda  Even Communist China’s head of propaganda, Mr Li Changchun has reportedly boasted that the Confucius Institutes are “an important part of China’s overseas propaganda set-up” (Economist October 22, 2009).

Image:archivenet

Despite such knowledge these institutes of disinformation have been welcomed in a number of countries, most notably perhaps within the United States and England where some prestigious academic institutions have established working associations with the Confucius Institute.   No doubt there is some political influences at work here, in that governments may tolerate and encourage their educational establishment to engage with the Confucius Institute as part of a general appeasement of China to maintain positive relations. There is also among the educational establishment no doubt an innocent appreciation of Chinese culture which sees such programs as a positive project to promote, such thinking is cognisant of China’s dark record of oppression and violence but is insufficiently concerned not to be a willing partner in promoting the values of Chinese culture. However, those Universities that collaborate with the Confucius Institute expose themselves to a number of troubling forces and compromises, as noted by Canadian Nobel Laureate nominee and human rights lawyer, David Matas, who cautions that China’s government officials pressurize universities to censor those who may express a critical or dissenting voice against China. He is concerned that institutions associated with Confucius Institutes are particularly exposed to such influence.  “In some places where we’ve gone, we’ve had last-minute cancellations at universities where they have Confucius Institutes … with no plausible explanation,”.

Image:archivenet

Those whose critical faculties have been bewitched by China’s culture seem oblivious of such restrictions and censorship, and indifferent to the corrosive influence they bring. As noted by Juneau-Katsuya, the former CSIS agent, communist China’s espionage activities overseas exploit citizens of the target country, individuals once described by Lenin as “useful idiots.”. These people, in Katusya’s words, “…are so in love with China and so taken with Chinese culture, and so hungry to make friends, that they’re ready to do almost anything. And they will close their eyes to so many different things,”. Would those who rationalize away the atrocities and suppression have held a similar attitude to the cultural refinements of other draconian regimes, would they have oozed admiration for Germany’s high art and language while the Gestapo were surrounding the Jewish Ghetto in Warsaw, or attended classes in Cambodian sponsored by Pol Pot’s Khymer Rouge?

 If you find this post of interest it will be most helpful if you would kindly share on any social network/s which you may subscribe to. Use the buttons below to add the post so others may become aware of this issue. Many thanks

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

China Sentences Uyghur Journalists For ‘Crimes’ Of Free Speech

A bulletin just received from colleagues at the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) reports that three Uyghur-language website managers were (Friday July 30th) given prison terms of three to ten years having been determined ‘guilty’ of what the communist Chinese regime laughingly called “endangering state security.” The three had been imprisoned following demonstrations against Chinese occupation in East Turkestan’s capital city Urumchi in July 2009.

According to the CPJ bulletin: “Nijat Azat, who managed the website Shabnam, was sentenced to a 10-year prison term; Dilixiati Paerhati, whose ran the website Diyarim, was given a five-year term; and the webmaster of Salkin, who goes by the single name Nureli, was sentenced to three years. The sites, all of which have been shut down by the government, had run news articles and discussion groups concerning Uighur issues. In its coverage, The New York Times cited friends and family members of the men as saying they were prosecuted for failing to quickly delete content that openly discussed the difficulties of life in Xinjiang (Editors note: more correctly termed occupied East Turkestan) and, in one case, for allowing users to post messages publicizing the protests that turned violent in July 2009.“

Thanks to CPJ for the information

If you find this post of interest it will be most helpful if you would kindly share on any social network/s which you may subscribe to. Use the buttons below to add the post so others may become aware of this issue. Many thanks

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Deadly Escape Route From Prison Tibet

Cick Image For Magnified View

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

India Repeats China’s Lie

S M Krishna Appeasing China By Betraying Facts On Tibet

Image:archivenet

India, that nation which itself emerged from foreign domination, announced July 29 that there was to be no change to its position on Tibet, which it is happy to assert as being Chinese territory. Ever mindful of economic relations with China, and the military sensitivities that shadow relations with Beijing concerning India’s border with occupied Tibet, India’s External Affairs Minister S M Krishna was keen, via a written response in the Indian Parliament, to reassure Beijing that:

”India’s position on Tibet has been consistent; India recognises that the Tibet Autonomous Region (sic) is part of the Territory of the People’s Republic of China,”

Like his predecessors Mr Krishna knows all too well that Tibet is an independent nation under illegal Chinese occupation, that Tibet’s people, culture, and governance enjoyed political and territorial sovereignty. However the enlightened principles that gave birth to India as a nation, its struggle against occupation, count for little against the commercial and political realities of maintaining relations with China, and offer no solidarity with the just and legitimate cause of Tibet’s nationhood. Instead the Government of India exploits Tibet as a political token to encourage its alliance with China, it may indeed have offered a refuge to Tibetan exiles, but its support goes no further, the rest is cynical betrayal.

If you find this post of interest it will be most helpful if you would kindly share on any social network/s which you may subscribe to. Use the buttons below to add the post so others may become aware of this issue. Many thanks

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

CPJ Condemns China’s Unjust Sentence Against Uyghur Journalist

New York, July 26, 2010—The 15-year jail sentence imposed by a Chinese court on Uighur journalist and website manager Gheyrat Niyaz is unjustly harsh and should be overturned immediately, the Committee to Protect Journalists said today. The fact that Niyaz was convicted under sweeping “endangering state security” charges is an indicator of how far the government will go to silence journalists who speak critically about sensitive issues in the county, CPJ said. According to international media reports, Niyaz was punished because of an August 2, 2009, interview with Yazhou Zhoukan (Asia Weekly), a Chinese-language magazine based in Hong Kong. In the interview, Niyaz said authorities had not taken steps to prevent violence in the July 2009 ethnic violence that broke out in East Turkestan (renamed by communist China as so-called Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region). At the time, media reports said about 200 people were killed in the violence.

 “Gheyrat Niyaz has been harshly punished because he dared to criticize the government for not trying to stop the ethic violence before it started,” said Bob Dietz, CPJ’s Asia program coordinator. “We call on the authorities to overturn this miscarriage of justice and free Niyaz immediately.”

Information courtesy of CPJ

Common Sense-A Lesson From History For Tibet’s Cause

Thomas Paine's Revolutionary Declaration

 Image:archivenet

Freedom begins from the double barrel of reason and passion! A few writings have changed humanity and Common Sense is one of them. Were Common Sense not written, most probably America today would still be languishing under the political yoke of Britain. Not a single individual, whether sane or insane, had ever said a word of American independence before Common Sense was written. It jolted the American people into action for freedom and independence from Britain rule.

Thomas Paine’s little pamphlet Common Sense is one of those books that changed the world. Like The Communist Manifesto, or The Origin of Species, it had the effect of altering men’s minds with consequences that were far-reaching and long-lasting. No one could have predicted such a work from the pen of Paine, who had come to America only in 1774 at the age of 37 after a very undistinguished career in England. He was a born propagandist, however, and the cause of American independence fueled his imagination and inspired his writing. Of all the thousands of political pamphlets that have been forgotten since the invention of printing this is one that has survived. Written as an ephemeral tract, it has remained one of the important documents of American history. The pamphlet appeared on 10 January 1776, less than six months before the signing of the Declaration of Independence. At the time it was published Americans were very much divided in their attitude towards Britain. The struggle for home rule had been going on for years and was gradually intensifying, but only a few Americans then favored separation from England. The Continental Congress was called in 1774 in an effort to head off a radical solution. Benjamin Franklin, in London, said in March 1775 that he had never heard anyone in America, drunk or sober, advocate independence. George Washington told a friend in May 1775 that if the friend ever heard of Washington joining the movement for separation, he had his leave to set him down for everything wicked. Thomas Jefferson wrote in July 1775 that he was looking with fondness towards reconciliation with Great Britain.

Then the next January Paine’s pamphlet, with title supplied by Benjamin Rush, burst on the colonies, and nothing was ever the same afterwards. Although leaders like Washington, Samuel Adams, Franklin, Richard Henry Lee, and others were beginning to work quietly for independence by that time, no one before Paine had come out flatly in print for separation. Paine’s pamphlet swept through the colonies, and since there was no copyright law, anyone could reprint it. Perhaps 100,000 copies were in circulation by the time the Declaration was signed, and it has been estimated that probably every literate person in the thirteen colonies had read it. The population of the colonies was 2.5 million. While most writers of political pamphlets were intellectuals writing for other intellectuals, Paine wrote a prose that anyone could read including farmers, mechanics, tradesmen and laborers. Paine committed every logical fallacy in his argument, but the brilliance of his journalism was overwhelming, and it had a catalytic effect in moving public opinion in favor of independence. This single most influential revolutionary manifesto of the era was not written by a well-known leader thought to be “exceptional” or “super human,” but rather by a complete unknown whose anonymity was maintained even as his pamphlet unleashed revolutionary impulses throughout the continent.

Washington wrote to Joseph Reed that letters he had received from Virginia, mentioned that the pamphlet was working a powerful change there in men’s minds. Charles Lee, who became a general in the continental army, wrote to Washington to say that he had never seen such a masterly, irresistible performance that would give the coup-de-grace to Great Britain. Franklin and others also testified to the prodigious effects of the pamphlet when the first copies arrived in the American camp at Cambridge.  An officer in that army observed that a reinforcement of five thousand men would not have inspired the troops with equal confidence as this pamphlet did. Of course, the Revolution might have occurred whether or not Paine had existed, but Common Sense prepared people’s minds for the break with England. It awakened the public mind, and led the people loudly to call for a declaration of American national independence.

Image:archivenet

Where Thomas Paine got the ideas that he put into his pamphlet is moot. He was not a reader, and he no doubt picked up his notions here and there, perhaps from conversations with friends like Franklin and Rush. He always prided himself on the originality of his ideas, but his thoughts on government and natural rights were widely current in the Enlightenment, as perhaps are the ideas of Freud today among people who never have read him. The idea with which Paine opened his pamphlet, that “…government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one” was held by many liberal theorists of the time. After this preliminary statement, Paine went for the jugular in attacking the British Constitution and undermining American loyalty to the Crown. Americans were already were at odds with Parliament over the issue of taxation without representation, but they did not blame the king for their grievances. Paine attacked monarchy, hereditary succession, and the divine right of kings with eminently quotable language.

As for the divine right of William the Conqueror to rule England, he said, “A French bastard, landing with an armed banditti and establishing himself king of England against the consent of the natives is in plain terms a very paltry rascally original.” Then Paine moved on to “Thoughts on the Present State of American Affairs” in which he offered nothing more than simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense. So he went on, arguing sometimes logically, sometimes illogically, arguing by analogy, begging the question, but always phrasing his brief in memorable language. He ended this section with a peroration for freedom: “O ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose not only the tyranny but the tyrant, stand forth! Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Europe regards her ‘freedom’ like a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart. O receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind.”

Then he ended the final chapter of the pamphlet with a call for a DECLARATION FOR INDEPENDENCE.

Ths Essay was kindly submitted by Mila Rangzen-Note: Common Sense was translated into Tibetan by Lhasang Tsering and Pema Bhum, under the Tibetan title of rGyun shes. The translators also included a lengthy scholarly introduction by Issac Kramnick and a glossary of relevant political and historical terms. The book was published by Amnye Machen Institute in 1995, in its World Literature Translation Series.

If you find this post of interest it will be most helpful if you would kindly share on any social network/s which you may subscribe to. Use the buttons below to add the post so others may become aware of this issue. Many thanks

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine