Firstly the graphic was kindly sent to us us by @AnonymousTibet. Secondly the ‘masala’ was added by Tibet.net (CTA) by not bothering to read what was so obvious, could they not see what RFA had written? Surely they had checked it BEFORE printing? If so then they obviously have no problem in describing Kham as part of China! Both the CTA and RFA need to be challenged for such actions and we are happy to support @AnonymousTibet on this matter.
tibettruth.com 
It was news given by RFA not Tibet.Net.
Dont put masala
Firstly the graphic was kindly sent to us us by @AnonymousTibet. Secondly the ‘masala’ was added by Tibet.net (CTA) by not bothering to read what was so obvious, could they not see what RFA had written? Surely they had checked it BEFORE printing? If so then they obviously have no problem in describing Kham as part of China! Both the CTA and RFA need to be challenged for such actions and we are happy to support @AnonymousTibet on this matter.